Quoted – High-Tech Tax Subsidies Do Little Good – Heartland Institute

* Mission: STS-41-B * Film Type: 70mm * Title:...
Image via Wikipedia

High-Tech Tax Subsidies Do Little Good

Pennsylvania’s attempts to lure high-tech companies by offering big tax incentives have brought only marginal gains, according to a new study.

The Keystone State had a net gain of 43 high-tech employers between 1990 and 2006, but a net loss of 2,850 jobs, according to the study, funded by the Pittsburgh nonprofit Heinz Endowments and conducted by a Washington nonprofit organization called Good Jobs First.

Some, though not all, of these jobs go overseas. Others go to Silicon Valley or other areas with established technology infrastructures that include potential business partners and support businesses—such as law firms—and low-cost utilities and other resources.

“I love Pennsylvania. I live and work here; it’s a beautiful state,” said Scott Testa, professor of business administration at Cabrini College in Philadelphia. “But it’s not the center of the universe as far as technology is concerned.

“That’s Silicon Valley or, to a lesser extent, the Boston area,” he added “Most tech start-ups are small anyway, so they would have a very small tax burden. High-tech companies want a good ecosystem of technology business partners, lawyers, accountants, and talent. Despite globalization, there’s something to be said for being close to the people you are going to do business with.”

Expects States to Persist
That’s why many tech companies, including start-ups, gravitate to Silicon Valley despite a high cost of living and other expenses higher than those offered through some incentive programs, Testa said.

Yet Testa expects state governments to continue to offer targeted tax breaks because they are much easier to get approved than across-the-board corporate tax cuts.

“It’s a lot easier to use a pistol than a shotgun,” Testa said.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Quoted – Ruiz Insider Trading Charge May Be Overblown – Internetnews.com

Image representing AMD as depicted in CrunchBase
Image via CrunchBase

If AMD‘s former CEO is guilty of insider trading, he wasn’t very effective at it.

The secondary rumbles from the Gallen Management hedge fund scandal that shook AMD and the rest of the Silicon Valley this week, included the stunning news that a straight-arrow like Hector Ruiz, the company’s former CEO, would be involved in insider trading.

While Ruiz‘s tenure with AMD (NYSE: AMD) did not end well at all – he fell on his sword after several consecutive quarters of severe losses and the Barcelona processor was more than a year late, harming AMD’s relationship with OEMs –Ruiz had a solid reputation as an honest player, not given to this kind of activity.

While it doesn’t excuse the behavior, it may get Ruiz off the hook with just mud on his face and his good name. “Insider trading you lose money on, I’m not sure how that’s an advantage. Penalties are based on how much you make. If you lose money does that mean the government writes you a check?” joked Rob Enderle, principal analyst with The Enderle Group.

“That’s one way to look at it,” countered Scott Testa, professor of Business Administration at Cabrini College in Philadelphia. But that’s no excuse, he argues. “There was insider info and they tried to use it to their advantage and they lost money, but at the end of the day there’s still manipulation of the markets, so even though they lost money that doesn’t mean what they did wasn’t illegal.”

Enderle believes Ruiz simply spoke out of turn. “He’d been getting heat for not doing anything as CEO, I think he wanted to share this info of what he was doing as CEO,” he said. “My take is I think these execs got kind of excited about what they were doing and shared the info with the wrong people. There’s no evidence [Hector] financially benefited.”

Testa doesn’t buy it, saying most chief executives are pretty cautious in their statements. That said, he and Enderle do agree on one thing: Ruiz is hardly going to fry over this.

“They may say ‘you have a fine and cut us a check and let’s go on our way.’ I don’t see them making him a scapegoat. I could be wrong, but he lost money, is no longer serving [as CEO]. He’s not the golden ticket,” said Testa.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]